WASHINGTON
(AP) — President Barack Obama's determination to act alone to change
the immigration system promptly drove a wedge Wednesday into the
post-election commitment from the president and Republican leaders to
find common ground under the new political alignment.
Obama
defiantly stood by his pledge to act on his own to reduce deportations,
grant work permits and improve border security by the end of the year
despite resounding election victories by Republicans strongly opposed to
his plans. The Senate's likely majority leader next year, Mitch
McConnell, R-Ky., declared that such a move would amount to "waving a
red flag in front of a bull."
On
a day when both sides tried to herald a new era of potential
compromise, immigration stood out not only as a single obstacle to
bipartisanship but as a sign that the hard-fought election and the heavy
Democratic losses had not pushed partisan sparring aside.
"I
have no doubt that there will be some Republicans who are angered or
frustrated by any executive action that I may take," Obama said in a
post-election news conference. "Those are folks, I just have to say, who
are also deeply opposed to immigration reform, in any form, and blocked
the House from being able to pass a bipartisan bill."
He cast his executive actions as an inducement for Republicans to pass their own immigration bill.
"The
best way, if folks are serious about getting immigration reform done,
is going ahead and passing a bill and getting it to my desk. And then
the executive actions that I take go away," he said.
Republicans led by McConnell pledged to use their newfound majorities to stop him.
"I
hope he won't do that, because I do think it poisons the well for the
opportunity to address a very important domestic issue," McConnell said
in Louisville, Kentucky, as he celebrated a victory in his own Senate
race and the GOP's capture of the Senate.
Some
on the right said executive action on immigration could even be grounds
for impeachment. Several House Republicans said Obama would make it
very difficult to cooperate on other issues if he acts on immigration.
"Him moving ahead like that, I think he's completely tone deaf to what happened last night," said Rep. Phil Roe, R-Tenn.
And
a half-dozen GOP senators, including Ted Cruz of Texas, wrote to Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., on Wednesday urging him to quickly
pass legislation to block Obama from taking executive action. Otherwise,
the senators warned, they'll use "all procedural means necessary" to
resolve what they called a constitutional crisis of Obama's making.
But
Obama appeared in no mood for waiting. He had already angered Latinos
and immigration advocacy groups this fall when he delayed executive
action until after the election.
"What I'm not going to do is just wait," he said. "I think it's fair to say I've shown a lot of patience."
Immigration advocates made clear that their patience, too, was at an end.
"The
election is over. Act boldly to bring relief to the millions facing
deportation and family separation," Janet Murguia, head of National
Council of La Raza, said at a news conference Wednesday. "The Hispanic
community has waited too long and expects you to fulfill your promise."
White
House officials say Obama, who is traveling to Asia and Australia next
week, would not take any action until late November at the earliest and
could wait until December.
Advocates
in touch with the White House expect Obama to expand a 2-year-old
program that deferred deportations for more than 500,000 immigrants
brought here illegally as minors, and made them eligible for work
permits. He is also expected to take steps to make more business visas
available.
Advocates
say White House officials are debating whether to require a certain
term of residency in the U.S. — say 10 years — and whether eligibility
criteria would include the parents of immigrants who received
deportation deferrals under Obama, or only people who have children who
are U.S. citizens because they were born here.
Such decisions could determine whether the program affects as many as 3 million people or more, or fewer.
In
an interview, Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., a leading immigration
advocate, said anything fewer than 5 million to 8 million people would
be insufficient. He and others argue that Obama's actions will infuriate
Republicans no matter how many are affected.
"Half a loaf is going to be unsatisfactory to everyone," Gutierrez said.
No comments:
Post a Comment